Growing
up, the daughter of researchers, I internalized the notion that science was the
most benevolent thing an intelligent person could do in their lifetime. My
parents feared I would become bored studying education, and so I combined it
with psychology. Butler’s psychology courses relied on all-knowing professors
to impart wisdom, whereas education courses required discussion to facilitate
learning. Like a prophecy, I disengaged from these discussions and the field of
education, until I took ED 416.
ED 416 taught strategies for developing,
modifying, and implementing curriculums. To my surprise, this process was quite
scientific. Initially, my peers and I were encouraged to observe our focal students
and form hypotheses based on relevant theories for ways to incur cognitive
growth. But, as I began testing and experimenting with my curriculum, I recognized
that attempting to fit instruction into a scientific mold was a disservice to
myself and my focal student: Rayah.
Rayah was a challenging student; but
I loved her tremendously. Already as a kindergartener, she was “behind” in math
and reading. On October 3rd I reflected, “I am excited for all of
the learning potentials we [Rayah and I] have, but I am concerned … I will be
unable to help Rayah make progress.” By the next week, something had
clearly changed. I wrote, “I have to focus my attention on being a learner.”
This insight stemmed from one of the most valuable concepts ED 416 taught me:
that learning is a reciprocal process.
Immersed in Reggio pedagogy at the
lab schools, I developed new beliefs about the roles of teacher and student.
According to Reggio philosophy, “relationships … function as a vehicle for
learning.” The way I had separated myself from my professors and peers isolated
me from forming the relationships necessary for growth. Slowly, I understood
the ways my educators had attempted to learn alongside me, and that I was
responsible for making meaning out of our classroom discussions. I learned to
sit in class without becoming frustrated, and I learned to sit beside Rayah
without trying to fix her.
On our last day, each student
described their progress. I listened intently and celebrated my classmates’
successes and hoped they would empathize with mine. Nervously, I explained where
my predilection for science came from, and the place I believed it should
occupy in the discipline. I reasoned that science was helpful for planning
lessons, but teaching was artful. Most importantly, I concluded that
relationships with other students promoted valuable learning that could not be represented
statistically.
This course transformed the way I comprehend
learning and cognition as social, rather than individual, processes. After
completing ED 416, I conducted research on social processes involved in
classroom achievement. This research later evolved into my thesis. Today, I
remain an active and supportive classmate, happily reminding myself that everyone
has something important to say, and that I am eager to learn from their
perspectives. After all, all students are teachers.